A Couple Spent $12,800 On Carry Permits… And Still Can’t Carry Everywhere

About this video

Colion examines a Supreme Court amicus brief in Johnson v. Jacobson, highlighting a case where a truck driver with carry permits from Florida and Georgia must disarm when entering Minnesota. He explains that Second Amendment Foundation and other groups argue this violates historical tradition, citing that travelers were historically exempted from local carry restrictions, and questions why states can require redundant permitting when the petitioner has already been vetted by other states.

Key takeaways

• Colion reports that one couple spent $12,800 to obtain concealed carry permits across multiple states, yet still cannot carry in four states despite the financial and time burden
• Colion describes how gun rights groups filed an amicus brief arguing that historical tradition from the colonial era through the 19th century exempted travelers from local carry restrictions, which Minnesota’s current policy contradicts
• Colion notes that Florida has revoked only 0.36% of over 6.6 million permits issued since 1987, yet Minnesota still requires re-permitting for already-vetted out-of-state permit holders

Episode details: published September 19, 2026 · 6:55 long. Summary written by Self Growth Videos from the episode itself. Colion Noir’s legal commentary reflects his positions and teaching, attributed to him — it is not legal advice. His defensive-incident breakdowns are his analysis of reported incidents, attributed to him.

← Previous: He Came Back For Round Two… Then The Armed Homeowner Was Ready · Next: They Called Armed Resistance To Tyranny A Pop Concept… So You Don’t Need It →

All Colion Noir videos · Colion Noir profile · Colion Noir on YouTube