Armed Security Protecting Supreme Court Justice Who Votes Against 2A Rights Shoots Armed Car Jacker

About this video

Colion reports on an incident where Deputy US Marshals protecting Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor shot an armed suspect attempting a carjacking. He argues this illustrates what he sees as hypocrisy: Sotomayor benefits from armed protection while, according to Colion, she has voted against Second Amendment rights in cases like McDonald v. Chicago and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. Colion contends that anti-gun politicians and judges aren’t truly anti-gun—they simply oppose gun rights for ordinary citizens while retaining armed security for themselves.

Key takeaways

• Colion argues that the incident demonstrates the effectiveness of armed defense, as the Marshals’ firearms stopped the threat
• According to Colion, Justice Sotomayor dissented in key Second Amendment cases that would have expanded gun rights for ordinary citizens, which he views as contradictory given her own armed protection
• Colion claims that politicians and judges who support gun control aren’t anti-gun themselves—they’re anti-gun for regular citizens while maintaining armed security for elites

Episode details: published July 12, 2024 · 7:54 long. Summary written by Self Growth Videos from the episode itself. Colion Noir’s legal commentary reflects his positions and teaching, attributed to him — it is not legal advice. His defensive-incident breakdowns are his analysis of reported incidents, attributed to him.

← Previous: April Nicol’s Love Of Firearms Got Her To Be A Character In Call Of Duty · Next: Surviving A Home Invasion: How One Night Made This 2A Influencer A Gun Advocate →

All Colion Noir videos · Colion Noir profile · Colion Noir on YouTube