Colion Noir exposes Politifact’s dishonest attempt to defend Anti-Gun Hillary Clinton

About this video

Colion argues that Hillary Clinton’s references to Australia’s gun policies signal support for mandatory confiscation disguised as buybacks. He critiques PolitiFact for defending Clinton’s statements, claiming the fact-checking site mischaracterized her clear endorsement of Australia’s mandatory buyback program. Colion explains that mandatory buybacks are confiscation because citizens face criminal charges for noncompliance, and he questions the objectivity of media outlets that defended her remarks.

Key takeaways

• Colion contends that mandatory buyback programs, like Australia’s, are confiscation because gun owners are forced to surrender firearms under threat of criminal prosecution.
• Colion believes Clinton knowingly cited Australia, Canada, and the UK as models because those countries implemented gun confiscation, revealing her true intent despite claims of supporting the Second Amendment.
• Colion warns that fact-checking sites like PolitiFact may lack objectivity, urging viewers to critically evaluate sources even when they present themselves as unbiased.

Episode details: published October 19, 2016 · 5:00 long. Summary written by Self Growth Videos from the episode itself. Colion Noir’s legal commentary reflects his positions and teaching, attributed to him — it is not legal advice. His defensive-incident breakdowns are his analysis of reported incidents, attributed to him.

← Previous: Colion Noir Takes on Vice’s Mark Hay’s Anti-Gun Deception · Next: Why Gun Control Won’t Fix Inner City Violence →

All Colion Noir videos · Colion Noir profile · Colion Noir on YouTube