Comedian Mocks Armed Citizens Taking On The Government

About this video

Colion responds to a comedian’s joke claiming the Second Amendment is obsolete because modern military technology (drones, missiles) would easily defeat armed civilians. Colion argues the comedian misunderstands both historical context and modern asymmetric warfare, pointing to Afghanistan and Ukraine as examples where armed populations resisted superior military forces. He contends that an armed citizenry isn’t designed to win open battles but to make tyranny too costly and politically unsustainable to attempt.

Key takeaways

• Colion teaches that the Founders intended armed citizens to have military parity with government forces, noting private ownership of cannons and warships in the 1700s, not just muskets
• According to Colion, resistance doesn’t require defeating the military in open battle—Afghanistan and Ukraine demonstrate that armed populations make occupation prohibitively expensive and politically untenable
• Colion argues that armed citizens create political and moral pressure within the military itself, making soldiers less willing to enforce tyranny against their own armed neighbors and families
• Colion points out what he sees as a contradiction: critics claim civilians can’t match military power, yet oppose allowing civilians access to military-grade weapons that would close that gap

Episode details: published July 8, 2026 · 9:30 long. Summary written by Self Growth Videos from the episode itself. Colion Noir’s legal commentary reflects his positions and teaching, attributed to him — it is not legal advice. His defensive-incident breakdowns are his analysis of reported incidents, attributed to him.

← Previous: The Fourth Of July Shooting New York Gun Laws Didn’t Stop · Next: Taylor Swift’s Wedding Shows Who Gun Control Really Applies To →

All Colion Noir videos · Colion Noir profile · Colion Noir on YouTube