Does This Liberal Podcaster Have a Point About Getting Rid of Guns?

About this video

Colion responds to a podcast clip in which someone argues that melting all guns would end gun violence. Colion critiques this position as naïve, arguing that violence is a human behavior, not a technology problem, and that eliminating firearms would not eliminate evil or violent intent. He contends that throughout history, people have committed mass violence using trucks, explosives, knives, and other tools, and maintains that the solution is prepared, capable individuals willing to defend themselves and others.

Key takeaways

• Colion argues that eliminating all guns is both impractical and would not end violence, since violence predates firearms and adapts to available tools.
• According to Colion, historical mass attacks using vehicles, bombs, and edged weapons demonstrate that evil and violent intent persist regardless of weapon availability.
• Colion teaches that personal preparedness and the willingness of good people to defend against violence—embodied in his ‘FAFO’ philosophy—are the only reliable counters to human aggression.
• Colion interprets the Second Amendment as acknowledging the reality of human nature and the need for individual responsibility for one’s own safety.

Episode details: published November 29, 2025 · 6:07 long. Summary written by Self Growth Videos from the episode itself. Colion Noir’s legal commentary reflects his positions and teaching, attributed to him — it is not legal advice. His defensive-incident breakdowns are his analysis of reported incidents, attributed to him.

← Previous: The New Standard in Wireless Ear Protection For The Gun Range · Next: Trackhawk Thieves Didn’t Expect an AR Pistol Waiting for Them →

All Colion Noir videos · Colion Noir profile · Colion Noir on YouTube