Germany’s Latest Crowd Attack Shows The Tool Was Never The Problem

About this video

Colion analyzes recent vehicle-ramming incidents in Germany to argue against the effectiveness of tool-based bans. He contends that restricting firearms does not prevent mass casualties because, in his view, determined attackers will use whatever means are available—citing vehicle attacks in Nice, Oklahoma City, and Germany as examples. Colion argues that firearms are the best equalizer for self-defense and that citizens should prepare for threats rather than rely on restrictions.

Key takeaways

• Colion argues that vehicle-ramming attacks in Germany demonstrate that restricting one tool (firearms) does not prevent mass casualties, as attackers will use other means
• He contends that historical incidents like the Nice truck attack and Oklahoma City bombing show higher body counts than many mass shootings, challenging the premise that gun restrictions reduce overall harm
• Colion teaches that firearms are the most effective self-defense tool for law-abiding citizens to protect themselves against various threats, and that disarmament leaves people vulnerable

Episode details: published May 6, 2026 · 8:53 long. Summary written by Self Growth Videos from the episode itself. Colion Noir’s legal commentary reflects his positions and teaching, attributed to him — it is not legal advice. His defensive-incident breakdowns are his analysis of reported incidents, attributed to him.

← Previous: Caught On Video: Texas Dad Shoots Carjacker Trying To Steal SUV With His Kids Inside · Next: TMZ Just Proved How Weird The Media Is About Guns →

All Colion Noir videos · Colion Noir profile · Colion Noir on YouTube