Proof Facebook Fact-Checkers Are Censoring Debates On Constitutional Rights Like the 2nd Amendment

About this video

Colion breaks down his experience being fact-checked by PolitiFact after he published a video arguing that 90% of Americans do not actually support universal background checks. He argues the fact-checker used misleading polls that asked vague questions about background checks rather than specifically about universal background checks, and claims the article was a biased hit piece designed to damage his credibility and limit his reach on Facebook rather than an objective analysis of his claims.

Key takeaways

• Colion argues that polls claiming 90% support use vague questions about ‘background checks’ rather than specifically asking about ‘universal background checks,’ which he says are different and would require a national gun registry to enforce effectively
• Colion points to actual state ballot initiatives on universal background checks (Washington, Nevada, Maine) where support ranged from 48% to 59%, which he presents as evidence that informed voters don’t support universal background checks at 90% rates
• Colion contends that PolitiFact’s fact-checker acted with bias, gave him insufficient response time, unnecessarily published his real name, and included out-of-context statements about Parkland in what he characterizes as a deliberate attempt to damage his reputation and limit his platform reach

Episode details: published March 17, 2021 · 19:37 long. Summary written by Self Growth Videos from the episode itself. Colion Noir’s legal commentary reflects his positions and teaching, attributed to him — it is not legal advice. His defensive-incident breakdowns are his analysis of reported incidents, attributed to him.

← Previous: Ruger Max-9 - Affordable Sub Compact with High Fire Power · Next: Atlanta Shootings Prove Universal Background Checks Like HR8 Will Not Prevent Gun Violence →

All Colion Noir videos · Colion Noir profile · Colion Noir on YouTube