SIG Finally Answers the P320 “Ghost Firing” Allegations

About this video

Colion hosts Phil Strader from Sig Sauer to discuss the ongoing P320 controversy. Colion reports on Phil’s defense of the firearm against claims it can discharge without a trigger pull, his breakdown of mechanical safety features, his explanation of test data from both Sig and plaintiff’s expert witnesses, and his concerns that range bans and negative attention may be empowering anti-gun advocacy groups.

Key takeaways

• Colion presents Phil’s assertion that the P320 cannot fire without a trigger pull due to multiple mechanical safeties, including a striker safety lock that only disengages when the trigger moves rearward
• Colion shares Phil’s claim that plaintiff attorneys’ own expert witnesses have been unable to replicate uncommanded discharges in court testing, leading some legal arguments to shift from ‘gun fires on its own’ to ’trigger design is defective’
• Colion highlights Phil’s view that unintentional discharges may stem from system vulnerabilities—light-bearing holsters with wide trigger-guard openings allowing foreign objects or fingers to contact the trigger—rather than firearm defects
• Colion relays Phil’s concern that range bans following the Air Force incident (later found to involve trigger manipulation and a disengaged manual safety) provide ammunition to anti-gun groups and plaintiff attorneys citing those bans as evidence of danger

Episode details: published November 20, 2025 · 1:12:10 long. Summary written by Self Growth Videos from the episode itself. Colion Noir’s legal commentary reflects his positions and teaching, attributed to him — it is not legal advice. His defensive-incident breakdowns are his analysis of reported incidents, attributed to him.

← Previous: US Gun Guys Mock This Olympic Shooting Sport — Yet We Never Win · Next: The Moment 8 Thieves Realized They Picked The Wrong Jewelry Store →

All Colion Noir videos · Colion Noir profile · Colion Noir on YouTube