Starbucks No Gun Policy Response

About this video

Colion argues that Starbucks took an anti-gun stance, not merely an anti-open-carry stance, when it requested customers not bring firearms into stores. He criticizes the company for singling out lawful gun owners while ignoring other disruptive behaviors, and warns against division between open-carry and concealed-carry advocates. Colion acknowledges that Starbucks, as a business, chose to protect its profits, but emphasizes that personal safety and gun rights remain more important than corporate convenience.

Key takeaways

• Colion views Starbucks’s request as an anti-gun position that unfairly targets responsible gun owners rather than actual threats or disruptive behavior
• According to Colion, infighting between open-carry and concealed-carry supporters weakens Second Amendment advocacy and plays into opponents’ hands
• Colion teaches that personal safety and the right to carry—whether open or concealed—should take precedence over corporate policy or consumer convenience

Episode details: published September 20, 2013 · 4:01 long. Summary written by Self Growth Videos from the episode itself. Colion Noir’s legal commentary reflects his positions and teaching, attributed to him — it is not legal advice. His defensive-incident breakdowns are his analysis of reported incidents, attributed to him.

← Previous: AR 15 Table Top Review: DDM4V1 From Daniel Defense · Next: Colion Noir For NRA NEWS: “Remember New Orleans?” →

All Colion Noir videos · Colion Noir profile · Colion Noir on YouTube