The ATF Director Just Corrected A Senator On Machine Guns & FRTs

About this video

Colion analyzes a 2025 Senate hearing exchange in which Senator Jack Reed questions ATF Director Robert D’Aquino about forced reset triggers (FRTs). Colion argues that Reed misrepresents the legal definition of a machine gun by focusing on rate of fire rather than the statutory “single function of the trigger” standard, which Colion says the Supreme Court already rejected in 2024. Colion contends that Reed ultimately admits FRTs are currently legal and calls for changing the statute, which Colion frames as an attempt to expand regulatory definitions without legislative votes.

Key takeaways

• Colion teaches that the legal definition of a machine gun under the National Firearms Act hinges on whether it fires more than one shot per single trigger function, not on rate of fire.
• Colion reports that the DOJ conceded in a 2025 settlement that Rare Breed’s forced reset trigger is not a machine gun because it still requires one trigger pull per round.
• Colion argues that Senator Reed’s proposed rate-of-fire standard was already rejected by the Supreme Court in a 2024 bump stock case and would create an unworkable regulatory framework that could criminalize skill rather than devices.

Episode details: published June 7, 2026 · 11:45 long. Summary written by Self Growth Videos from the episode itself. Colion Noir’s legal commentary reflects his positions and teaching, attributed to him — it is not legal advice. His defensive-incident breakdowns are his analysis of reported incidents, attributed to him.

← Previous: Armed Homeowner Shoots Intruder After Door Gets Kicked In · Next: This Might Be The Best Pocket Gun On The Market Now →

All Colion Noir videos · Colion Noir profile · Colion Noir on YouTube