This Fake Pro 2A Influencer Is Lying to Your Face — And People Are Falling For It

About this video

Colion responds to a viral social media argument claiming the Second Amendment’s ‘militia clause’ justifies gun control. He breaks down what he views as fundamental misunderstandings of the amendment’s structure, the Supreme Court’s Heller ruling, and 18th-century legal history. Colion argues that historical evidence, including the Militia Act of 1792 and founding-era writings, actually supports an individual right to bear arms without infringement.

Key takeaways

• Colion explains that according to the Heller decision, the Second Amendment’s prefatory ‘militia’ clause explains why the right exists, but does not limit the operative clause protecting an individual right to keep and bear arms
• Colion argues that the Militia Act of 1792—often cited as evidence of early gun regulation—actually required citizens to own firearms, which he presents as the opposite of gun control
• Colion contends that ‘well regulated’ in 18th-century usage meant ‘well-organized’ or ‘properly functioning,’ not government-restricted, and that early concealed carry bans were cultural norms about respectability, not restrictions on the right itself
• Colion points out that gun control advocacy receives substantial funding from billionaires like Michael Bloomberg, challenging the claim that only gun rights supporters are motivated by financial interests

Episode details: published April 25, 2026 · 11:42 long. Summary written by Self Growth Videos from the episode itself. Colion Noir’s legal commentary reflects his positions and teaching, attributed to him — it is not legal advice. His defensive-incident breakdowns are his analysis of reported incidents, attributed to him.

← Previous: Something About This “Mass Shooting” Story Felt Off · Next: White House Dinner Shooting: They Say AR-15s Are Too Dangerous — Until They Need Them →

All Colion Noir videos · Colion Noir profile · Colion Noir on YouTube