Two Men Jumped A Concealed Carrier In A Mall… One Didn’t Walk Away

About this video

Colion analyzes a reported mall food court shooting in which a concealed carry license holder shot two men after what Colion describes as being jumped in a two-on-one attack, killing one and injuring a bystander. He argues that the carrier was released pending investigation and breaks down why, in his view, the self-defense claim may be justified despite the mall’s no-weapons policy. Colion emphasizes that fighting poses serious bodily injury risks, that two-on-one attacks can justify defensive force, and that situational awareness and avoidance should always come first.

Key takeaways

• Colion argues that attacking someone who may be armed is extremely risky, and that victims of multi-person assaults face serious bodily injury or death regardless of the attackers’ intent
• According to Colion, Michigan’s deadly force standard covers both death and serious bodily injury, and a two-on-one attack can meet that threshold even if the attackers didn’t intend to kill
• Colion teaches that mall no-weapons policies are house rules, not criminal statutes, and do not eliminate a valid self-defense claim under the law as he interprets it
• Colion stresses that situational awareness and avoidance are the first line of defense, and that using a firearm in a crowded space carries inherent risks and demands shot discipline

Episode details: published July 15, 2026 · 5:50 long. Summary written by Self Growth Videos from the episode itself. Colion Noir’s legal commentary reflects his positions and teaching, attributed to him — it is not legal advice. His defensive-incident breakdowns are his analysis of reported incidents, attributed to him.

← Previous: He Got Called Racist For Posting Reckless Gun Clips · Next: He Tried To Avoid Shooting Him… But The Road Rager Came Back →

All Colion Noir videos · Colion Noir profile · Colion Noir on YouTube