Why Bernie Sanders is Anti Second Amendment And Proud of It

About this video

Colion responds to a debate exchange in which Bernie Sanders was challenged on his gun manufacturer liability votes. Colion argues that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act is sensible policy, not a special exemption, because it prevents manufacturers from being sued for criminal misuse of their products by third parties. He criticizes Sanders for what he describes as pandering to anti-gun extremists by reversing his position and adopting talking points on assault weapon bans and background checks that Colion characterizes as empty rhetoric unsupported by data.

Key takeaways

• Colion teaches that gun manufacturers can be sued for defective products, but the PLCAA protects them from liability for third-party criminal misuse—similar to how car or alcohol makers aren’t liable for drunk driving deaths
• Colion contends that allowing such lawsuits would bankrupt the industry and force manufacturers to sell only to government, effectively ending civilian Second Amendment access
• Colion criticizes Bernie Sanders for what he sees as abandoning his previous pro-gun votes and adopting anti-gun positions (assault weapon bans, expanded background checks) to appeal to the Democratic base

Episode details: published February 28, 2020 · 5:04 long. Summary written by Self Growth Videos from the episode itself. Colion Noir’s legal commentary reflects his positions and teaching, attributed to him — it is not legal advice. His defensive-incident breakdowns are his analysis of reported incidents, attributed to him.

← Previous: Joe Biden Thinks Guns Have Recently Killed Nearly Half Of All Americans | Tucker Carlson · Next: Why Bloomberg Is The Biggest Threats To The Second Amendment →

All Colion Noir videos · Colion Noir profile · Colion Noir on YouTube